If you are unable to read this newsletter
Please go to our website for the webversion
EDITION 2, 2010
We are pleased to send you the digital newsletter published by the Employment Law practice group at AKD.
Appearing bimonthly, the newsletter contains an overview of recent and important developments in the field of employment law.

Please feel free to forward the newsletter to any contacts who you feel may be interested in developments in Employment Law.
Subscribe and unsubscribe »
Go to website »






Transfer of ownership and rights under collective bargaining agreements »
Absence of mutual contractual agreement »
Final discharge, final acquittal? »
Is an employee allowed to drink from two wells? »
(Extralegal) consent in introduction of dress codes? »
Transfer of ownership and rights under collective bargaining agreements
When a business changes hands, all rights and obligations associated with employment agreements go with it. The question is what is the situation with collective bargaining agreements (CAOs) that, following the transfer of business ownership, are declared to apply retroactively to a period before the business changed hands?
Absence of mutual contractual agreement
When an employee and an employer terminate an employment contract by mutual consent by means of a settlement agreement the employee may subsequently claim that the agreement involved vitiated consent. The subdistrict court in Enschede recently delivered a ruling in such a case.
Final discharge, final acquittal?
Any unclarity concerning the content and purpose of agreements written into a settlement agreement is commonly deemed to be at the risk and expense of the employer. Does this also apply when employer and employee have ‘forgotten’ to include a provision covering a specific item?
Is an employee allowed to drink from two wells?
Enschede’s subdistrict court recently ruled that an employee’s wages should be reduced as he had been paid by a new employer during a period when he had been relieved of work.
(Extralegal) consent in introduction of dress codes?
NS-Reizigers (NSR), a division of Dutch railways, had new company clothing in mind for staff in its Service & Safety department. NSR opted for a range of uniforms with a view to ensure the recognition of staff having different responsibilities. This was as much to make it clear for the public, as it was for personnel, the particular function in which an employee was engaged. Some personnel were in direct contact with customers while others, for instance, were special investigators whose work might involve them in violent situations. NSR wanted to indicate these differences via company clothing rather than through different forms of headgear (e.g. a hat for men and a small cap for women).
Disclaimer
While considerable care has been taken in compiling the content of this newsletter, AKD is not liable for any consequences resulting from any incompleteness or inaccuracies.
AKD provides responsible and rapid support during reorganisations and multiple redundancies by relying on its ‘ReQuire’ tool. Details are available on our website »
The specialist group of our Employment Law team has extensive experience in transfer of undertaking and outsourcing. See our website for more information.
Do you want to keep up to date with developments on co-determination? See our website for more information.
Contact the following staff concerning any issues relating to this newsletter:
AMSTERDAM
Marieke Grootveld
mgrootveld@akd.nl
+31 88 253 51 73
ROTTERDAM
Dorien van Straten
dvanstraten@akd.nl
+31 88 253 53 51
EINDHOVEN
Ton Hendriks
thendriks@akd.nl
+31 88 253 56 96
BREDA
Suzan de Lange
sdelange@akd.nl
+31 88 253 59 54